Good times :)

"BiTurbo228 - Dr Frankenstein of Spitfires" (biturbo228) 12/22/2013 at 15:03 • Filed to: None

0

8

So, the company that supplied me the !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! for the Jag have actually been really good about it. I'm rather impressed. They think the contractor they use to make exhausts put them through the jig used for 4.0l cat cars, whereas mine's a 3.6l with no cat. They're having some new ones made up for me just after the new year.

!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!

Goshen, formerly Darkcode > BiTurbo228 - Dr Frankenstein of Spitfires 12/22/2013 at 15:05

0

There's a 3.6L Jaguar I6?

BiTurbo228 - Dr Frankenstein of Spitfires > Goshen, formerly Darkcode 12/22/2013 at 15:10

0

Yep :) the early AJ6 engines were 3.6l, and later ones were 3.2l or 4.0l.

You might be thinking of the XK engine , which was 2.4l, 2.8l, 3.4l, 3.8l or 4.2l.

Goshen, formerly Darkcode > BiTurbo228 - Dr Frankenstein of Spitfires 12/22/2013 at 15:12

1

Nah I just thought all AJ6s were 4.0s. Interestingly enough I never associated the DB7's 3.2 with the AJ6.

BiTurbo228 - Dr Frankenstein of Spitfires > Goshen, formerly Darkcode 12/22/2013 at 15:33

0

Yeah, it took me a while before I stumbled upon that as well. Sort of makes me want to find a crashed DB7 and swap the drivetrain into my XJ40 :)

Goshen, formerly Darkcode > BiTurbo228 - Dr Frankenstein of Spitfires 12/22/2013 at 15:40

1

That...would be insane.

BiTurbo228 - Dr Frankenstein of Spitfires > Goshen, formerly Darkcode 12/22/2013 at 16:02

0

I'd convert it into this while I'm at it :)

Then I'd go scare S4 Avants and 5-Series Tourings.

Goshen, formerly Darkcode > BiTurbo228 - Dr Frankenstein of Spitfires 12/22/2013 at 16:02

0

Is that done by Lynx?

BiTurbo228 - Dr Frankenstein of Spitfires > Goshen, formerly Darkcode 12/22/2013 at 16:26

0

Unfortunately not. It's a factory prototype that never reached production. If it were a Lynx thing there might be one out there for me to buy, but alas not.